Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is set in its place.
In the event the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by possibly party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and move forward according to your legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may very well be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outdoors traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as an important alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and effectively.
We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws of your United States and this State.
10. Without touching the merits with the case on the issue of annual increases during the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these annual increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, necessitates further assessment to generally be made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It can be very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Doing a case regulation search may very well be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, like:
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
Because the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Criminal cases From the common law tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. here Compared with most civil law systems, common law systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.